Skip to content
Got a notice? Emergency response

Property, Sale

Deducting what you spent improving an Indian property when the bills are gone

You put real money into that flat or house over the years, but the receipts are long gone and you are not sure any of it counts.

Before you sell, you add up what you actually put into the property: an extra room, a rebuilt roof, a covered terrace, a full modernisation. It runs to lakhs, and it should reduce the gain you are taxed on. The problem is that most of it was paid years ago, often in cash to a contractor, with no bills that survived, and you are abroad and cannot reconstruct them. It feels like money you spent but cannot prove, and the buyer's TDS working ignores it entirely.
Last reviewed: 26 July 20268 min readReviewed by Preetesh Maloo, CA

The short answer

Improvements of a capital nature, an added floor, an extension, a structural rebuild, are deductible from the sale price as cost of improvement (Section 48), which reduces your capital gain. Routine repairs, repainting and maintenance are not deductible. Where the bills are gone, a registered valuer estimates the year-wise cost of the improvements from the approved building plans, the municipal record of the extra construction and any bank or loan trail, and that documented estimate is what the return relies on. One limit: if you have used the 1 April 2001 fair-market value as your cost, any improvement made before that date is already inside it and cannot be claimed again.

Is this your situation? Get a senior CA on it.

Free 15-minute call. We tell you what applies to you and what it costs, then you decide. You stay abroad.

Senior CA who specialises in NRI tax · we deal with the tax officer, you don't

Chat with a CA on WhatsApp

What counts as improvement, and what does not

The law lets you deduct the cost of improvement, meaning capital expenditure that adds to or alters the property, from the sale price when you compute the gain (Section 48). The test is whether you created something new and lasting or simply kept the house in the state it was in. An added floor, an extension, a garage, converting a terrace into a room, a structural rebuild, all add to the asset and qualify.

Repainting, replacing broken fittings, waterproofing a leak, annual maintenance, these keep the property usable but do not add to it, so they are not cost of improvement. The distinction matters because it decides what you can put against the gain. A useful line to hold: if the work changed what the property is, it is likely improvement; if it kept the property as it was, it is likely a repair.

Proving it when the bills are gone

Missing receipts do not automatically kill the claim, but they raise the standard of what else you show. A registered valuer can reconstruct the year-wise cost of the improvements from the approved building plans, the municipal or panchayat records of the sanctioned extra construction, photographs from before and after, and any bank withdrawals or loan sanctions from the period that line up with the work.

What the return relies on is that documented estimate rather than a number you assert. The more the estimate is tied to independent records, the sale being registered at a higher built-up area than the original, a home-improvement loan on the bank statement, a municipal assessment that rose after the additions, the harder it is for the assessing officer to disturb it. A bare claim with nothing behind it is the version that gets disallowed.

The pre-2001 double-count bar, and the NRI rate

There is one limit worth stating plainly. If the property was acquired before 1 April 2001 and you have chosen to use its 1 April 2001 fair-market value as the cost (Section 55(2)(b)), then any improvement made before that date is already reflected in the 2001 value and cannot be added again. Only improvements made after 1 April 2001 are claimed on top of the 2001 cost. Improvements to an inherited property made by the previous owner also count as yours.

For an NRI, the gain that remains after cost and improvements is long-term if the property was held for more than twenty-four months, taxed at a flat 12.5% with no indexation for sales on or after 23 July 2024 (Section 112). The resident-only option of 20% with indexation is not available to an NRI, so getting every rupee of genuine improvement into the cost is one of the few levers you have on the rate.

What's involved

What the CA actually does

  1. 1

    We separate improvement from repair

    We go through what you spent and split the capital improvements, which reduce the gain, from the repairs and maintenance, which do not, so the claim is defensible rather than inflated.

  2. 2

    We rebuild the evidence

    We work with a registered valuer to estimate the year-wise improvement cost from the approved plans, municipal records and bank trail, and we assemble the supporting documents that tie the estimate to something independent.

  3. 3

    We apply the pre-2001 rule correctly

    Where you are using the 2001 fair-market value as cost, we make sure only post-2001 improvements are added on top, so the claim does not double-count and invite a challenge.

  4. 4

    We carry it into the gain and the return

    We set the improvements against the sale price, compute the long-term gain at the NRI rate, and carry it into your Indian return and the Form 13 working so the TDS reflects the real gain.

What to have ready

Documents you'll typically need

  • Approved building plans or municipal records of the additions
  • Photographs before and after the work, where available
  • Bank statements or loan sanctions from the period of the improvements
  • Any contractor agreements or part-bills that did survive
  • Registered valuer's year-wise estimate of the improvement cost

Your destination country can change the details

Requirements differ from one consulate, university and visa route to the next, how recent the figures must be, how long funds must have been held, and which certificates are mandatory. We assemble the documents around the exact checklist you're applying under. To see how India's tax treaty with your country of residence affects related filings, set your country below or compare all 46 countries.

References on this page

  • Section 48, cost of improvement deducted from sale consideration
  • Section 55(1)(b), meaning of cost of improvement
  • Section 55(2)(b), 1 April 2001 fair-market value, which absorbs pre-2001 improvements
  • Section 112, flat 12.5% long-term rate for NRIs, no indexation, post 23 Jul 2024

Frequently asked questions

Common questions

It depends what was done. Work that adds to or alters the property, an extra floor, an extension, converting a terrace into a room, a structural rebuild, is cost of improvement and deductible under Section 48. Repainting, replacing fittings and routine maintenance keep the property as it was and are not deductible. A genuine modernisation usually mixes both, so it is split rather than claimed in full.

Not automatically. A registered valuer can estimate the year-wise improvement cost from the approved plans, the municipal record of the extra construction, before-and-after photographs and any bank or loan trail from the period. That documented estimate is what supports the claim in place of the missing bills, though a bare figure with nothing behind it will be disallowed.

Only if you are not using the 2001 fair-market value as your cost. If you use the 1 April 2001 value under Section 55(2)(b), any improvement made before that date is already inside that value and cannot be added again. Improvements made after 1 April 2001 are claimed on top of the 2001 cost.

Yes. When you inherit a property, the previous owner's cost, holding period and cost of improvement all carry to you, so capital improvements the earlier owner made are treated as yours for computing the gain, subject to the same evidence and the pre-2001 rule.

The exceptions that change the answer

Where the general rule stops applying to you

Every rule below has a carve-out, a cut-off date or a condition that flips the answer. These are the ones that decide real cases.

Long-term holding period: all other assets including immovable property

Right now: 24 months for ALL assets other than listed securities

Where it works differently

Unlisted shares transferred on or after 23 July 2024
24 months, down from 36.
Finance (No. 2) Act 2024 rationalised every non-listed asset to 24 months.
The asset was inherited
The previous owner's holding period is added.
Explanation 1(b) to s.2(42A), read with s.49(1).
The transfer is a slump sale under s.50B
The 36-month long-term line is retained, not the 24 months that applies elsewhere.
s.50B was not rationalised by the Finance (No. 2) Act 2024, so the 36-month line survives there alone.

Commonly got wrong

  • Unlisted shares are long-term after 36 months. True only for transfers up to 22 July 2024. It is 24 months from 23 July 2024.State the transfer date, then the period.
  • Debt mutual funds become long-term after 36 months. Specified mutual funds bought on or after 1 April 2023 are always short-term under s.50AA, regardless of holding period.Specified mutual funds bought on or after 1 April 2023 are always short-term under s.50AA.

Spent real money improving the property but cannot prove it?

Tell us what was done and roughly when. A practising CA will scope what qualifies and how to evidence it on a free call, no obligation.

No card, no obligation. All certification and filing work is handled by ICAI-registered practising Chartered Accountants.