Why the first step is finding, not claiming
Families almost always start at the wrong end, chasing the one bank they know about, and discover months later that there was a second account, an old folio of mutual funds, or shares sitting in a government fund. By then some windows have moved and the picture has to be rebuilt anyway. It is far cleaner to map the whole estate first, then claim against a complete list.
The difficulty for an NRI is distance. Statements arrived at an Indian address, the email used for online access may be one you can't get into, and your parent may never have told anyone the full extent of what they held. Tracing is genuinely investigative: you work outward from the documents you do have. A cheque book, a single statement, a PAN, an old policy bond, and pull the threads each one exposes.
Mapping the estate also serves a second purpose. The same inventory and date-of-death valuation feeds the succession or probate schedule, the court fee, and the deceased's final tax return, so the work is not wasted. Doing it properly once means the claiming stage runs on a clean list rather than a series of surprises.
The asset classes to trace, one by one
An Indian estate usually spreads across several systems that don't talk to each other, so each has to be checked on its own.
Bank accounts and fixed deposits : the PAN and the home branch are the starting points; a deceased's PAN can also surface accounts through the tax record. Mutual funds and demat (listed shares) : old physical share certificates, CAS (consolidated account) statements, and the registrars (RTAs) such as CAMS and KFintech help reconstruct folios. Property : title deeds, society records and the sub-registrar. Life insurance : policy bonds, premium debits in the bank statement, and the insurer's records. PF and PPF : the employer, the EPFO record, or the post office / bank holding the PPF. Shares in a private company your parent ran or invested in : a different search entirely, the MCA's own company master data (searchable by the company's CIN or name) shows who its shareholders and directors were, not a demat account or a registrar.
| Asset type | Where to trace it | Public search |
|---|---|---|
| Bank / FD | Home branch, PAN, passbook | UDGAM |
| MF | CAS, RTAs (CAMS, KFintech) | MITRA |
| Listed shares | Demat, old certificates, registrar | IEPF portal |
| Insurance | Policy bonds, premium debits | each insurer's own list |
| PF / PPF | Employer, EPFO, the bank or post office | none |
| Private company shares | MCA master data (CIN / company name) | MCA portal |
Only four of those have a public search, and none of them covers everything, so the columns do different jobs. The table is a starting map rather than the territory: gold, bonds, small savings and old chit or co-operative holdings turn up too. Go system by system rather than assuming one search settles it.
A private company is worth flagging separately because inheriting shares in one isn't just a transmission, if your parent was also a director, the company itself may now have a board vacancy to sort out, and non-repatriable FEMA rules of its own for what the shares are worth. See inheriting a company: the resident-director and repatriation trap if that applies.
The assets that quietly leave the building
Some of it has already left the institution your parent dealt with, and where it went decides both how you search and whether there is a deadline.
| Where it went | What moved | Deadline to claim |
|---|---|---|
| IEPF | shares, after 7 years of unpaid dividend | none |
| RBI's DEA Fund | bank balances dormant 10 years, searchable on UDGAM | none |
| Senior Citizens' Welfare Fund | unclaimed insurance, PPF, EPF and post-office savings | 25 years, then it escheats |
That third row is the one to act on. It is easy to assume every unclaimed Indian asset waits indefinitely, and for shares and bank deposits it does. For anything in the Senior Citizens' Welfare Fund the claim expires and the money goes to the government.
Mutual funds behave differently again: the units do not move anywhere, they simply become invisible once a folio goes quiet, which is what the MITRA search exists for. Insurance has no central search at all, so it is insurer by insurer.
The reason this belongs in the mapping phase rather than the claiming phase is sequencing. Claim only the live accounts and close the estate, and these are missed entirely.
The documents that unlock every conversation
Institutions will not discuss a deceased person's holdings, let alone release them, until two things are established: that the person has died, and that you are entitled to act. Everything flows from those two proofs.
The death certificate is the foundation: you will need several certified copies, because every bank, registrar and insurer wants its own. Heirship is the second pillar, and which proof you need depends on the asset: a legal heir certificate (from the local revenue authority) covers many routine transfers, while securities, bank balances, deposits, shares, usually require a succession certificate from the court, or a probated will where there is one. These certificate routes are legal work, handled by an advocate; the sibling page on succession and legal heir certificates covers them in detail.
Separately, the tax side opens once you register as the deceased's legal representative on the income tax portal (Section 159): which lets you operate their PAN to see the tax record, file the final return, and claim any refund. That registration often surfaces assets the family didn't know about, because interest and dividends reported against the PAN point straight back to the accounts paying them.
A worked example: a daughter rebuilding her father's estate from Canada
Meera, an NRI in Toronto, lost her father in Pune. She knew of one savings account and the family flat, and assumed that was most of it. With no full list, she started by gathering five certified copies of the death certificate and registering as her father's legal representative on the income tax portal.
That registration was the turning point. Her father's tax record showed interest from a second bank she'd never heard of and dividends from a shareholding, and the dividend trail led to a block of shares that had been transferred to the IEPF years earlier because the dividends had gone unclaimed. Working outward, the CA used the CAS to reconstruct two old mutual fund folios through the registrars, traced a lapsed-looking insurance policy from premium debits in the bank statement, and confirmed a PPF balance at the post office. Each asset was valued as on the date of death, so the same schedule could feed the succession petition, the court fee and her father's final return. Only once the full map existed did the claiming begin. The live accounts through the succession route, the shares through a separate IEPF claim, so nothing was left stranded. The court and IEPF filings sat with the lawyer and the IEPF process; the discovery, the valuation and the tax steps were the CA's.