Skip to content
Got a notice? Emergency response →
Back to all posts
capital-gainsmutual-fundstax-filing

A resident with the same gain can pay zero. As an NRI you pay from the first rupee. Here is why.

TL;DR

Two people sell the same shares for the same gain. One is a resident with little other income and pays almost nothing. The other is an NRI and pays the full rate. The difference is a single word in the law: the basic exemption limit can be set against capital gains only for a resident. Here is how that works, what it costs an NRI, and the one capital-gains break you do keep.

By , Founder

Reviewed by Preetesh Maloo, Chartered Accountant, NRI Tax Partner

Published 2026-07-23 9 min read ICAI-registered CAs

The one-word difference

Picture two people who sell the same mutual fund on the same day and make the same 3 lakh long-term gain. One is a resident with a small pension and little other income. The other is an . The resident can walk away paying almost nothing. The NRI pays the full rate. Same asset, same gain, very different bill.


The reason is a single word buried in the tax law. Every individual has a basic exemption limit, the slice of income below which you pay no tax. Residents are allowed to set their capital gains against any unused part of that limit. s are not. The rule that permits the set-off says, in plain terms, that it is for a resident individual. So a low-income resident can shelter a gain under the exemption and pay little or nothing, while an NRI is taxed on the gain from the very first rupee.


This is not a loophole a resident is exploiting. It is written into Sections 111A, 112 and 112A, which set the special rates for capital gains: the adjustment against the basic exemption limit is expressly limited to residents. Knowing it exists is the difference between planning around it and being blindsided by a tax bill you did not expect.

The short version

A resident whose other income is below the basic exemption limit can set capital gains against the unused part and pay little or nothing. An cannot: the set-off in Sections 111A, 112 and 112A is for residents only. So an NRI's Indian capital gains are taxed from the first rupee. The one break you keep is the 1.25 lakh a year exemption on listed-equity long-term gains under , which does apply to NRIs.

How a resident shelters a gain, and why you cannot

Here is the mechanic. Say the basic exemption limit is 4 lakh under the current regime. A resident whose only income is a 3 lakh long-term capital gain has used none of that 4 lakh limit on other income. The proviso to the capital-gains sections lets that resident pull the gain down into the unused exemption, so the whole 3 lakh sits inside the limit and the tax is nil.


Now make that same person an . The proviso does not apply. The 4 lakh basic exemption still shelters ordinary income like Indian rent or interest up to the limit, but it cannot be stretched over the capital gain. The gain is taxed at its own special rate straight away, with no first slice knocked off for the exemption.


So the basic exemption is not gone for an . It still works against ordinary income. What an NRI loses is the ability to park capital gains inside it. For someone whose Indian income is mostly capital gains, that is the whole ball game.

Same 3 lakh long-term gain, two very different bills

Resident, no other income

About nil

The 3 lakh gain is set against the unused basic exemption limit under the resident-only proviso.

NRI, same gain

Taxed from rupee one

No set-off against the basic exemption. The gain is taxed at its special rate, less only the 1.25 lakh 112A exemption if it is listed equity.

The numbers move with the regime and the asset, but the gap between resident and is structural, not a rounding difference.

The one break you keep: the 1.25 lakh exemption

There is good news, and it gets muddled online, so be clear about it. s do keep the annual exemption built into . Long-term gains on listed shares and equity mutual funds are tax-free up to 1.25 lakh in a financial year, and only the amount above that is taxed at 12.5 percent. That 1.25 lakh is available to residents and NRIs alike. It sits inside A itself, so it is not caught by the resident-only restriction on the basic-exemption set-off.


You will see some pages say s are taxed under Section 115AD instead of 112A. For an individual NRI, that is not right. Section 115AD is the regime for foreign institutional investors and specified funds, not for an ordinary NRI holding units in their own name. An individual NRI's listed-equity long-term gains fall under , at 12.5 percent above the 1.25 lakh, exactly like a resident, just without the extra basic-exemption cushion.


So the picture for listed equity is simple: you get the 1.25 lakh yearly exemption, you do not get the basic-exemption set-off on top of it.

Two different exemptions, do not confuse them

The 1.25 lakh annual 112A exemption on listed-equity long-term gains applies to s. The basic exemption limit set-off, parking gains inside the 4 lakh slab, does not. NRIs keep the first, lose the second.

What it costs, asset by asset

The bite depends on what you sold, because the special rate is different by asset, and only listed equity carries the 1.25 lakh cushion.


Listed shares and equity mutual funds, held long term: 12.5 percent, but only on the gain above 1.25 lakh in the year. Short term, held a year or less: 20 percent under Section 111A, from the first rupee, with no 1.25 lakh break.


Everything else, property, land, unlisted shares, gold, debt funds: taxed at its own rate, generally 12.5 percent long term without for an , or at slab or 20 percent depending on the asset and holding period, again from the first rupee. None of these has a 1.25 lakh cushion, and none of them lets an NRI use the basic exemption.


On top of the rate, the tax is usually taken at source. When an sells, the buyer or the fund deducts tax under before the money reaches you, at these special rates. So the shortfall is not just theoretical, it is withheld up front, and if too much was taken, you only get it back by filing a return.

Listed equity LTCG

12.5% over 1.25L

Listed equity STCG

20% from rupee 1

Property / unlisted / debt

Special rate, no cushion

Selling Indian shares or property as an NRI?

We compute the gain correctly, apply the 1.25 lakh exemption and any treaty relief, use the right reinvestment section, and recover the Section 195 tax that was over-withheld, so you pay what you owe and not a rupee more.

Senior CA who specialises in NRI tax · we deal with the tax officer, you don't

The rebate you also cannot use

There is a second resident-only benefit worth naming, because s keep hearing about it and assuming it applies to them. Under the current regime, a resident with total income up to 12 lakh pays no tax, thanks to the rebate. It is a headline number, and it is genuinely large.


It does two things an cannot rely on. First, the rebate is for residents only, so an NRI does not get it at all. Second, even for a resident, the rebate does not wipe out tax on these special-rate capital gains, it applies to normally taxed income, not to gains charged under Sections 111A, 112 and 112A. So the twelve-lakh-tax-free line you may have read about is doubly not your situation as an NRI selling shares or property.


The takeaway is not to bank on any of the low-income shelters. As an , your capital gain is taxed on its own terms, at its own rate, from the start.

The 12 lakh tax-free line is not for you, twice over

The rebate that makes income up to 12 lakh tax-free is resident-only, so an does not get it. And even a resident cannot use it against special-rate capital gains. Do not plan an NRI share or property sale around it.

What you can actually do

You cannot buy back the basic-exemption cushion, but there are real, legal ways to bring the bill down, and they are where the planning happens.


Use the 1.25 lakh, every year. It resets each financial year. If you are sitting on a large equity gain and are not forced to sell in one go, booking it across two or more years lets you take the 1.25 lakh exemption more than once.


Check your treaty. Some of India's treaties, notably with the UAE and Singapore, can assign the gain on certain securities to your country of residence, which may tax it lightly or not at all. That is a bigger lever than the basic exemption ever was, and it is worth confirming for your exact holding and country.


Reinvest, where the gain is from property or land. The reinvestment reliefs under Sections 54, 54F and 54EC are available to s, so rolling a property gain into another house or into specified bonds can defer or remove the tax the ordinary way.


Recover over-deducted tax. Because tax is withheld up front at the special rate, s are often over-deducted. Filing a return, with a lower-deduction certificate where it is worth it, is how you claim the excess back.

Four levers that beat the missing cushion

  1. Spread it

    Book a big equity gain across financial years so you claim the 1.25 lakh 112A exemption more than once.

  2. Treaty

    Check whether your , for example UAE or Singapore, assigns the gain to your residence country. A bigger lever than the basic exemption.

  3. Reinvest

    For property or land gains, use Sections 54, 54F and 54EC. These reinvestment reliefs are open to s.

  4. RecoverMoney back

    over-deducts at source. File a return, with a lower-deduction certificate where worth it, to claim the excess back.

Still have a question?

Ask our AI anything about this. It answers from our guides in plain English, and a CA takes over for your exact case.

AI guidance, not advice. Verify your exact case with a CA.

Talk to a CA

Want to know what you can recover?

A DTAA specialist CA will review your situation. Free. 15 minutes.

No recovery, no fee. We only charge when money actually comes back.

Get weekly DTAA insights for Gulf NRIs

Tax tips, treaty updates, recovery strategies. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Join 2,000+ Indians in Dubai who get our weekly digest.